reader.iuris.ph
Your Law School Companion
Try it now
Twelve landmark decisions are open to anyone: the full reader, the digest rail, the Court's own doctrine, a sample recit drill. Everything you see is what your own cases look like once you sign up.
Twelve cards from the twelve digests, with the recit clock off. Say the answer out loud, then grade yourself.
Browse the twelve as shareable digests →Guest reading is limited to these twelve and nothing is saved. Create your account to open any decision, mark it, and build your reviewer.
The Flow
Built for the student who works all day and reads at night — each step feeds the next, so the reviewer builds itself while you study.
Every citation — G.R. numbers, consolidated dockets, old L‑numbers — becomes a clickable case list under your prof's own headings.
Full decisions from the official public sources, rendered like a reporter page. Fetched once, instant for everyone after.
Tag facts, issue, ruling, doctrine — or highlight in four colors. A machine-read guide jumps you to the "whether or not…" and the WHEREFORE.
One-liner, facts, issues with answers, doctrine, memory hook — flagged AI-generated, never dressed as official. Digested once, shared forever.
Search a doctrine ("chain of custody"), a case name ("People vs. Gozo"), or a statute ("RA 9165") — the Court's indexers' own words, every case one tap away.
Topic-ordered, with the doctrine as the SC indexed it and the provisions verbatim — a clean PDF that walks into recit with you. Zero AI required.
Every digest you own is already a flashcard — the professor's question before the professor asks it. Pick a heading, say the answer out loud, grade yourself, re-drill only the misses. Zero AI at drill time.
Exhibit “A”
Select a passage, tap its role — the colors are the app's actual mark palette.
G.R. No. 113191 · marked in the reader
Private respondent filed a complaint for illegal dismissal against the ADB. The issue is whether or not the DFA has legal standing to file the petition. Settled is the rule that a state and its instrumentality enjoy immunity from suit. WHEREFORE, the petition for certiorari is GRANTED.
The Mechanism
In other tools, reading and making a reviewer are two separate all-nighters. Here the same motion does both.
By the Numbers
The Moat
Digest sites start from their library. This starts from your prof's PDF — nothing on the exam is missing.
The whole decision, never a summary of a summary — every case links its source of record.
Reading and reviewing are one motion — see the loop above.
The core is zero-AI; where AI helps it's labeled AI-generated · unreviewed.
25 forms — petitions, affidavits, Notice of Appeal — exported on 8.5 × 13 per the Efficient Paper Rule.
Flashcards per syllabus heading, a recit clock, and a list of what keeps slipping — no question bank to buy, it's already in your cases.
Cite Art. 1732 in a decision and the provision pops up inside the reader.
Where It Comes From
Supreme Court decisions are public domain (Sec. 176, R.A. 8293). Each decision is fetched once from the official sources, rendered cleanly, and always linked back to the record.
Your marks, notes, and uploads are yours alone — private to your account, backed up nightly.
Made in Davao by a busy law student who needed it to exist. Ask for an account, upload one syllabus, and walk into your next recit ready.
Works on your phone, tablet, and laptop · one account, one laptop + one mobile
Read the Handbook → · Watch the tutorials → · Watch the teaser →